[b-hebrew] There is Qal Passive stem!!!
peterkirk at qaya.org
Tue Sep 16 08:59:53 EDT 2003
On 16/09/2003 05:23, Trevor Peterson wrote:
>>===== Original Message From George Athas <gathas at hotkey.net.au> =====
>>There does appear to have been a Qal Passive at a very early
>>stage of Hebrew. The vestiges of it are seen mostly in the Qal Passive
>>participle. However, there are a handful of Qal Passive Perfects and
>>which are usually mistaken for Pual or Hophal forms. There is a short
>>of these in Seow's grammar (2nd Ed), pp.323-24. I'm sure there must be a more
>>detailed discussion elsewhere, too.
>W&O'C has a pretty good discussion of it, and you should find enough
>bibliography there to go further. ...
Thanks, George and Trevor, for refreshing my memory on this one.
But it still seems to me that any idea of a qal passive at 1 Sam 1:22 is
bringing in an unnecessary complication. At least I would want to see
evidence that there is a qal passive of ra'ah which would have the
correct consonantal form. And my point was that there is no need to
posit a passive form here as the active form is quite comprehensible,
and not theologically objectionable, when the idiom is understood.
peter at qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk at qaya.org (work)
More information about the b-hebrew