[b-hebrew] Other languages in the Tanakh
peterkirk at qaya.org
Wed Nov 19 18:09:31 EST 2003
On 16/11/2003 02:45, Karl Randolph wrote:
>When I studied journalism, the professors carefully emphasized that “libel” is the deliberate propagation of known falsehoods. If a fact is not known to be a falsehood until after publication, it is not libel. If the fact is true, then it is not libel.
Well, you could have tried to rely on the ignorance defence, but what
you wrote about Külling’s PhD dissertation makes that harder now.
>>>In particular that?s how I read Elaine Keown?s posting on this subject on the 11th. Do you think I read more into it than what is there? I know in other aspects, e.g. writing, theological concepts, etc., that?s exactly what BDB did, so it fits the pattern if they did with lexemes as well.
>>Elaine mentioned in general terms that there are loan words from many
>>languages in BDB. I think almost anyone would agree that among more than
>>8000 words in the dictionary there are some loan words, although there
>>might be wide disagreement on how many. That is very different from a
>>presupposition that nearly every word is a loan word, something which I
>>have never seen in any dictionary, and never heard anyone except you
>I didn’t say that nearly every word is a loan word. You put words in my mouth I did not say. I merely said of those words claimed to be loan words (a small percentage of the total number), I read Elain Keown’s post as saying that BDB claimed most are load words into Hebrew. I don’t deny that there are loan words into Hebrew, particularly during and after the Galut Babel, but the claim that most claimed loan words are loan words into Hebrew, especially from Greek and other sources, is a stretch.
What you wrote was:
>When a word is found in both Biblical Hebrew and another language, they [BDB] seem to make the presupposition that the word is a loan word into Hebrew.
BDB note cognates in other languages to a high proportion of the Hebrew
words in their lexicon, though not, I agree, to "nearly every word"
which was an exaggeration. Most of these cognates are in other Semitic
languages, which suggests that most are true cognates from a common
proto-Semitic origin rather than loan words in either direction. You
take BDB's noting of cognates as implying a presumption that these words
are loan words into Hebrew. That is a misunderstanding of BDB. I don't
think it's Elaine's misunderstanding.
peter at qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk at qaya.org (work)
More information about the b-hebrew