[b-hebrew] Re: Other languages in the Tanakh

Brandon M Cherry pentewyn at juno.com
Wed Nov 12 08:48:13 EST 2003

> From: "Trevor Peterson" <06peterson at cua.edu>
> Subject: RE: [b-hebrew] Other languages in the Tanakh
> To: <b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org>
> Message-ID: <001c01c3a853$d5237ad0$179cfea9 at SPEDRSON>
> Content-Type: text/plain;        charset="US-ASCII"
> This is a difficult question to answer, partly because words from 
> other
> languages can come into a text by various means. Is a true loanword
> considered an instance of a foreign language in a text, or does 
> that
> word now belong to the language in which it is found? Even the idea 
> that
> a proper noun is a foreign word has problems. I used to work in
> Cheektowaga, NY. It's not a word that originates in English, but I 
> have
> no idea how accurately it represents the Native American term. 
> Plus,
> that's the only name by which any English speaker calls the town, so 
> in
> that respect, it's an English name. I would say all of these things 
> are
> different from what we see with Aramaic, where the language is 
> fully
> used to write significant portions of the biblical text.
> Trevor Peterson
> CUA/Semitics

True enough. I hadn't really considered how complex the answers to my
questions could be. I'm sure many trees have been sacrificed for the
study of how loanwords immigrate and become "naturalized." Maybe a better
way to state what I'm looking for is What languages can be *readily*
shown to have influenced the text or contributed vocabulary outside of
Hebrew and Aramaic?

Brandon Cherry, M.Div.
Waco, TX  USA

The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!

More information about the b-hebrew mailing list