[b-hebrew] Re: 22nd Psalm & 40th Psalm

Peter Kirk peterkirk at qaya.org
Wed Dec 3 06:39:52 EST 2003

On 03/12/2003 03:11, Jason Hare wrote:

>So, would we then--if we accept this version--suggest a hapax legomenon in
>this verse?
I think we already know we have a hapax legomenon in this verse. Well, 
the MT ka'ari is not strictly a hapax, but the Nahal Hever form is. As 
there are already a large number of hapaxes in the Hebrew Bible, there 
is no good reason to reject the suggestion that this is one.

Peter Kirk
peter at qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk at qaya.org (work)

More information about the b-hebrew mailing list