[b-hebrew] Re: 22nd Psalm & 40th Psalm

Peter Kirk peterkirk at qaya.org
Wed Dec 3 06:39:52 EST 2003


On 03/12/2003 03:11, Jason Hare wrote:

>Peter,
>
>So, would we then--if we accept this version--suggest a hapax legomenon in
>this verse?
>
>Regards,
>Jason
>
>  
>
I think we already know we have a hapax legomenon in this verse. Well, 
the MT ka'ari is not strictly a hapax, but the Nahal Hever form is. As 
there are already a large number of hapaxes in the Hebrew Bible, there 
is no good reason to reject the suggestion that this is one.

-- 
Peter Kirk
peter at qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk at qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/





More information about the b-hebrew mailing list