Paul Zellmer pzellmer at
Sun Mar 17 14:32:34 EST 2002


In the Ezek 20:5 passage, the last three clauses are not controlled at all
by the first.  They are describing how Israel was chosen.

In the Ezek 24:25 passage, you are dealing with a complex definite object of
a single clause.  How does that show complex subordination?

Paul Zellmer

Ian wrote:

> Whoops. Too much in a hurry. Try, with the same aim,
> ie to show the government of complex subordination:
> Eze 20:5
> bywm  bxry by$r'l
>      w'$' ydy lzr` byt y`qb
>      w'wd` lhm b'rc mcrym
>      w'$' ydy lhm l'mr 'ny yhwh 'lhykm
> Eze 24:25
> bywm qxty mhm 't-m`wzm m$w$ tp'rtm
>               't mxmd `ynyhm
>              w't-m$h np$m bnyhm wbnwtyhm

More information about the b-hebrew mailing list