"Non-Academic" Original Languages?
mark at wessner.ca
Tue Dec 17 17:10:43 EST 2002
I here I thought I was asking a simple question yesterday ... ;-)
Actually, this whole discussion proves the importance of this mailing list
- where else could I get such a variety of comments from a variety of
students and teachers? Thank you for all of your advice!
I agree with you, Trevor, that it is better to learn the languages if at
all possible. An I that is the key - it is not necessarily *possible* for
everybody (due to interest, ability, resources, need, whatever). For
example, I would never trade my ability to use the languages (although I am
slowly getting rusty from non-use!) as it has changed the way I read the
Bible (and almost every other text - ancient or modern). However, I am
also very aware that not everybody has the interest or opportunity to go
all the way down the road. It is with these people in mind, that I asked
my original question. And I obviously didn't state it clearly - sorry!
So ... given the interest in this subject, if any b-hebrewers (or
b-greekers) would be interested in emailing me a list of their recommended
introductory language resources (and identify if this is for scenario 1 or
2), I would be happy to *try* to collate them into one list for your
further review. Such a resource may possibly prove to be a valuable tool
(as a generic starting point) for anyone who is interested in beginning to
learn/teach the languages. Then, as an individual's interest and
experience progresses, they will begin to form their own theory of language
acquisition (as is already so evident on this list!). I realize that this
may be an audacious goal, but it would be one small way of putting a
practical spin on all of this great discussion.
Let me know what you think ...
PS. I appreciate your cautions about the "a little knowledge ..."
At 11:59 AM 17/12/02, Trevor Peterson wrote:
> >===== Original Message From Mark Wessner <mark at wessner.ca> =====
> >Hmm ... I see two trains of thought developing regarding the intent of an
> >"introductory" Biblical language course:
> >1) A clear goal of enabling the students to explore the better language
> >tools (commentaries, inter-linears, some lexicons, etc.).
>With the caveat that not everyone agrees that all these tools are good to put
>at students' disposal.
> >An obviously, one is
> >not inherently "better" than the other, as they both use different
> >approaches to achieve different goals.
>I might disagree with that too :-) I still think that it's better to learn
>languages if at all possible.
>You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: [mark at wessner.ca]
>To unsubscribe, forward this message to
>To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew at franklin.oit.unc.edu.
More information about the b-hebrew