Paul's quotations (use of "baptism into Moses" in NT)

Harold R. Holmyard III hholmyard at ont.com
Fri Mar 9 21:45:26 EST 2001


Dear John,

>It may be acceptable grammatically, and "natural" as proven
>by the fact that no one has ever questioned whether the
>antecedant of Xristos should be sou rather than spermati but
>it is theologically impossible.  I'd say that lack of study
>of the OT (not grammar) is the reason Paul has not been
>understood.

John, why is the traditional view theologically impossible? Why could the
Abrahamic promises not be made to Christ as the seed of Abraham? Thanks.

			Yours,
			Harold Holmyard
			Dallas, TX







More information about the b-hebrew mailing list