qatal vs. katab
Maurice A. O'Sullivan
mauros at iol.ie
Fri Dec 14 11:02:57 EST 2001
Apart from the "heavyweight" reference grammars such as Gesenius, or the
Jouon, Paul, and Takamitsu Muraoka. A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew. Vol.
14/I. Orthography and Phonetics: Morphology.
Vol. 14/II. Syntax: Paradigms and Indices. .
Subsidia Biblica. Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute 1991.
I would suggest:
A Biblical Hebrew Reference Grammar
Christo H.J. van der Merwe
Jackie A. Naudé
Jan H. Kroeze
Biblical Languages 3: Hebrew
which is available in printed form from Sheffield Academic Press, or from
Logos in a most useful electronic form ( see www.logos.com )
At 15:28 14/12/01, Christian Hoffmann wrote:
>Not so long we discussed the choice of qatal as the paradigmatic stem for
>Hebrew verb grammar. We went through all the possible combinations, sorting
>out unwanted consonants, like
>aleph, he, waw, khet, yod, ayin, resh: weak letters -> weak stems, rarely
>beth, kaph, pe: change of hardness with veth, khaph, fe
>mem: is also a prefix
>nun, taw: occur in weak stems
>As a result, letters like
>gimel, dalet, zayin, tet, lamed, samekh, tsade, qoph, sin, shin.
>will remain. qatal is one possible combination. I don't remember which else
>Does anybody know a written source for this kind of reasoning?
>Dr.sc.math.Christian W. Hoffmann
>Mathematics and Statistical Computing
>Landscape Modeling and Web Applications
>Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL
>CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
>phone: ++41-1-739 22 77 fax: ++41-1-739 22 15
>You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: [mauros at iol.ie]
>To unsubscribe, forward this message to
>To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew at franklin.oit.unc.edu.
Maurice A. O'Sullivan [ Bray, Ireland ]
mauros at iol.ie
More information about the b-hebrew