HF$IBBO:LIYM (?) -- Gen. 41.24
churchh at usa.net
Mon Sep 25 11:11:59 EDT 2000
> Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 01:26:48 -0500
> From: "Jason Hare" <language_lover64801 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: HF$IBBO:LIYM (?) -- Gen. 41.24
> the form HF$IBBO:LIYM in Genesis 41.24. Is there a specific reason
> for there being no daghesh in the shin? Is there an explanation for
> such a difference in tradition and what is the significance of the
> BHS reading?
The BHS footnote implies that it's a peculiarity of manuscript "L" (B19a);
note that the footnote says "mlt" instead of "nonn" ;-)
I'm not aware of any phonological reason why the consonant _shin_
would be given a "guttural" treatment in this context...
Henry Churchyard churchh at usa.net http://www.crossmyt.com/hc/
More information about the b-hebrew