historiography--Language / consecutive forms
sbfnet at netvision.net.il
Sun Jan 2 11:00:45 EST 2000
On 01/01/00 (RE: historiography--Language) Niels Peter Lemche wrote:
> Dear Alviero Niccacci
< ... >
> Istn't interesting: no changes of syntax, and what kinds of
>morphology are we talking about. Besides, Alviero, try to answer my more
>recent post about Mesha instead of my first--later refuted mail. Mesha does
>display some linguistiv differences such as the jmn rbn, I referred to, and
>the feminimu -t in the absolute.
Dear Professor Lemche,
Thanks for calling my attention to a more recent post of yours that I
had overlooked--that of 30/12/99 if I am not mistaken. Let me try to
comment on your post and try to answer your questions.
Beforehand, I wish to describe the beginning of the inscription.
After Mesha's selfpresentation, the historical section starts in line
2 with an x-qatal construction that opens an oral narrative--exactly
as in BH. The next sentence is another x-qatal, not wayyiqtol (or
consecutive imperfect), because the speaker wishes to emphasize the
personal pronoun that comes before the verb; in the third sentence we
find a continuation wayyiqtol--everything as in BH: "My father ruled
(x-qatal) over Moab for thirty years and I, myself, I ruled
(waw-x-qatal) after my father. I made (wayyiqtol) this high place ..."
On 30/12/99 (Consecutive forms) Niels Peter Lemche wrote:
>Mesha: l. 3, w'´sh ... could be an example as the examples in ll. 7 (v'r'),
>l. 9 (v'bn) and l. 10 (vybn).
>The syntax of ll.4-5-6 is interesting: ´mry . mlk . isr'l . wy´nw . 't.m'b .
>ymn . rbn . ky . y'np . kmsh . b'rtsh . wychlph . bnh . wy'mr . gm .
>h'...Omri (was) king of Israel, and he oppressed Moab for a long time,
>because Kemosh was angry on his land, and his son followed him, and he said:
>also I. The verb i l. 5, wy´nw, is probably a consecutive form following in
>this case a nominal sentence, then the ky-sentence intrudes, and after that
>comes in l. 6 another w-consecutive sentence, but is this a case of the use
>of consequitives in biblical Hebrew because what governs the imperfects
>wychlph and wy'mr?
(AN) In Mesha line 3 a new unit of the oral narrative begins.
The wayyiqtol is preceded by a noun phrase that functions as an
extraposed element (topicalization; in traditional terms, casus
pendens): "Af for Omri king of Israel, he oppressed (wayyiqtol)
Moab." The following wayyiqtols in line 6 -- "his son succeded him
and said..." -- are coordinated to the previous wayyiqtol and carry
on the narrative mainline.
>< ... >
>Siloam: l. 2 has according to Gibson a consecutive form, but it is all in a
>lacuna and cannot be used. Both Doner and Renger reconstructs the line 2 and
>3 differently. But the best ever example of a consecutive form that follows
>the rules of biblical Hebrew is l. 4, 'and the waters went' wylkw following
>the perfect hkw at the beginning of the line.
>Lachish, almost nothing was found of interest, except No 4, l. 6/7 where
>there is an example that would fit. l. 9-10 is a dubious case because of the
(AN) Yes, in Lachish 4:6 there is a wayyiqtol form WY`lHW
"and he let him go up." This verbform continues a qatal LQH.H
"(Shemayahu) took him (i.e. Semakhyahu)"--as is usual in direct
speech--Lachish 4 is a letter.
>< ... >
>The surprise (to me-and I have to confess and admit my ignorance) is Metsad
>Hashawyahu, where there are three cases of consecutive forms, ll. 4/5 (one)
>and l. 7/8 (two cases).
(AN) Yes, Metsad Hashavyahu (or Yavneh-yam) is a very
interesting piece of narrative in direct speech. It contains, first,
the exposition of a past event, with wayyiqtol that continues
x-qatal. From the second sentence in line 8 to the end, the
complaining worker specifies what in his view is a very important
detail--that Hoshavyahu came AFTER he had already measured his
harvest and took his cloak. Everything as in BH.
>So where or not I like it, there are cases of consecutive imperfects in Iron
>Age Moabite and Judaean Hebrew, but so far i haven't seen any cases of
>consecutive perfects but would like to know whether any here knows about
>such cases. I haven't had the time to study the Arad texts today.
(AN) Some examples of "consecutive perfect", or weqatal, are
as follows: Lachish 4:10 WYD` "he shall know", Arad 2:5-6, 7 WHSBT
... WNTT "you shall send back ... you shall give"; Arad 3:2-3, 5,
6-7, 8 WTsWK ... WTsRR[T] ... WLQH.T "he shall order you ... [you]
shall tie ... you shall take"; Arad 16:4 W$LH.TM "you shall send."
A blessed New Year 2000.
Studium Biblicum Franciscanum Tel. +972 - 2 - 6282 936
POB 19424 - 91193 - Jerusalem Fax +972 - 2 - 6264 519
Home Page: http://18.104.22.168/www1/ofm/sbf/SBFmain.html
Email mailto:sbfnet at netvision.net.il
More information about the b-hebrew