sequentials, peter II

Vincent DeCaen decaen at
Tue Dec 5 10:15:51 EST 2000

another thought, based on your comment. notice what we derived together:
	~A v B	from	~A v ~~B

would that not explain right there the use of the past/perfect? consider:




if we say that past tense is T, and the nonpast is unmarked; and then say
that irrealis (mood) is propositional negation, we ought to get a
representation of the "past subjunctive" as double negation, which nets
out to the same thing (more or less).

what would be very interesting in this light is the use/value of real
double negation in natural language: ~~T is different from T. hmmm....

V -- 
Dr Vincent DeCaen     <decaen at>
c/o Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations, 4 Bancroft Ave., 2d floor
University of Toronto, Toronto ON, CANADA, M5S 1A1

Hebrew Syntax Encoding Initiative,
Love work. Hate authority.  --Shemaiah, from Avot

More information about the b-hebrew mailing list