Judges 5:30

George Athas gathas at mail.usyd.edu.au
Tue Sep 28 23:28:09 EDT 1999

Henry Churchyard wrote:

> I'm sorry, but I just don't see how it makes all that much sense to
> say that the understanding of this passage should be organized around
> a _rah.am_ vs. _na`arah_ axis,

That's exactly my point, Henry. _Raxam_ needs to be understood solely within the context
of the poem.

> considering that Jael and Deborah are
> simply not _na`aroth_, but rather are married adult women (_nashim_ I
> guess, unless there's some more specific term which is eluding me at
> the moment -- _g at bhirah_ is probably too specific, at least for Jael).

I completely agree. _G:birah_ seems to have the nuance of "Lady", "Mistress" or "Dowager".
I don't think we can apply these terms to Ya`el or Deborah, both of whom are "wives".
(There is, though, a case to be made that perhaps Deborah was a widow because she 'judged'
cases for people.)

> Also, I doubt whether _rah.am_ has some of the connotations you're
> ascribing to it

The irony of Jdg 5 certainly seems to imply that it does. We are dealing with poetry which
makes use of poignant vocabulary.

> -- and even if it did, this wouldn't necessarily
> provide much useful guidance towards coming up with an appropriate
> English translation.

That's the more difficult task. How do we carry the nuance of "wench" or "bimbo" into a
biblical translation? You could use one of those words, but it probably won't go down well
with many people.

Best regards!
 Dept of Semitic Studies,
 University of Sydney
Tel Dan Inscription Website is at

More information about the b-hebrew mailing list