b-hebrew digest: September 21, 1999

Matthew Anstey manstey at portal.ca
Wed Sep 22 00:57:25 EDT 1999


Gday Rolf & Dave,

Isn't the bo'u form an imperative? For your information Dave about lebilty:
lebilty + qatal (2x)
lebilty + yiqtol (2x)
lebilty + impv (1x)
lebilty + qetol (79x without intervening lamed; 1x with intervening lamed)
lebilty + qotel (1x - Kethiv)

With regards,
Matthew




More information about the b-hebrew mailing list