Studium Biblicum Franciscanum
sbfnet at netvision.net.il
Thu Dec 30 03:09:57 EST 1999
>Could it be that the distinction between the historical narrative and the
>direct speech in these cases is because of the relative contemporaneity of
>the direct speech narratives in each case? In each of the above examples,
>the narrative is first person; perhaps the initial qatal indicates the
>relative proximity, in time and perhaps personal interest, of the events
>narrated. Conversely, if a native BH speaker was narrating a story that was
>generations removed, might they begin with a wayyiqtol?
>Thanks, and God bless you!
>Joe A. Friberg
Dear Dr. Joe A. Friberg,
Thank you for your comment. It may be that, as you say, the choice of
qatal indicates the relative proximity in time and personal interest.
In my previous post, I pointed out a fact that seems to me highly
relevant. The appearance of first-second person depends on the
situation of the oral narrative in direct speech--in historical
narrative only the third person appears. Unlike modern narrators, the
Biblical narrator never shows up in the first person and never
addresses the reader in the second.
I doubt that the use of qatal versus wayyiqtol is a question
of proximity versus removedness. Actually, I think that whatever is
narrated orally comes into proximity with the narrator and with the
listener/reader irrespective of its chronological distance.
The fact remains that we do not have any evidence of an oral
narrative beginning with wayyiqtol.
Thanks, and peace and all good for the New Year 2000.
Studium Biblicum Franciscanum Tel. +972 - 2 - 6282 936
POB 19424 - 91193 - Jerusalem Fax +972 - 2 - 6264 519
Home Page: http://126.96.36.199/www1/ofm/sbf/SBFmain.html
Email mailto:sbfnet at netvision.net.il
More information about the b-hebrew