Methods in biblical scholarship (Solomon)

Ian Hutchesson mc2499 at
Mon Dec 27 21:43:19 EST 1999

Solomon Landers write:
>Aramaic fragments of 1 Enoch ...
>... was not a part of any known canon of the Hebrew or Jewish Bible,
though it
>appears to have been in use by sectarians or adherents of alternative

As the text appeared abundantly at Qumran along with all the major OT/HB
works and is cited in CD as having value, it would seem to be
representative, unless you for some reason consider the people who were
responsible for the Qumran deposit as being 'sectarians or adherents of
alternative "Judaisms."' If this is the case, how do you justify the position?



More information about the b-hebrew mailing list