JEPD Evidence

Jonathan Bailey jonathan.bailey at gmx.de
Sun Dec 19 15:21:09 EST 1999


---------- Original Message ----------

>Jonathan, you made a number of comments here that were good, I would like
>to throw out few ideas which to me are so simple, yet are ignored. 1. A
>simple reading of the Pent. shows that the author (redactor) attempted to
>present a chronological history. (There are some notable exceptions, but
>this is the rule.) 2. If one looks at the toldot in the begining of Genesis
>they seem to fulfil a literary purpose: They filling the blanks. It is hard
>to tell a story when you jump from Adam of Noah, and you have no idea who
>this Noah is. Likewise it allows for Abraham to be introduced. Later the
>countings of the tribes (which is similar in style to a toldot) fulfills
>that purpose. 

>My point being that from a pure literary standpoint had the toldot not been
>there, something else would be needed to fulfil that purpose. 

Well, this is good evidence. Better, I think, than Kirk's supposition that Moses wouldn't 
have carried written records around with him. Still, though, not entirely convincing. But 
I am reading Genesis right now keeping my eye open for this sort of thing, and will see 
where it takes me.




Jonathan Bailey
Hochschule für Jüdische Studien
Heidelberg



More information about the b-hebrew mailing list