Sabbath Origins (Peter)
Stephen C. Carlson
scarlson at mindspring.com
Sat Dec 4 14:02:36 EST 1999
At 07:49 AM 12/4/99 +0100, Ian Hutchesson wrote:
>>This is an unwarrented inference from the text. The text never says
>>that Adar is non-Hebrew, only that it is the name in Aramaic (SURIAKHi).
>>In order to draw your inference, you must first establish the linguistic
>>compentence of the author of 2 Macc (e.g., did he know the difference
>>between Aramaic and Hebrew?).
>I think you'd have to establish why the writer uses "Syrian" rather than
>"Hebrew" which would be the expected term, even if he didn't know the
>difference between Hebrew and Aramaic. The fact that he used "Syrian" here
>when he doesn't seem to be using the term "Hebrew" indescriminately in
>other places, requires one to show that the writer didn't intend "Syrian"
>instead of "Hebrew".
I don't think I have to establish anything at this point. You are
the one who is offering a thesis. I have merely pointed out one
leap in your reasoning that needs further substantiation. The fact
that you are unwilling to substantiate your reasoning is your problem,
Stephen C. Carlson mailto:scarlson at mindspring.com
Synoptic Problem Home Page http://www.mindspring.com/~scarlson/synopt/
"Poetry speaks of aspirations, and songs chant the words." Shujing 2.35
More information about the b-hebrew