Psa 16:10; chasideycha

peter_kirk at peter_kirk at
Wed Dec 1 21:54:17 EST 1999

The BHS text at this point in Psalm 16:10 is X:ASIYD:KF (in your 
transliteration this would be chasidkha), which is singular - no yod 
before the -kha ending. There is no textual note in BHS, and no note 
in HOTTP or the Word commentary. But are there other MSS, printed 
editions or translations which have a plural here? Could this be a 
correction, or an interpretation, to get away from the Christian 
understanding of this verse, in Acts 13:35?

Peter Kirk

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Psa 16:10; chasideycha
Author:  <devious at> at Internet
Date:    30/11/1999 00:00


Could someone point me in the right direction with this, I am not a Hebrew 
Isn't chasideycha plural? And if it plural then why is it translated in the 

Lee Deavers

You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: Peter_Kirk at 
To unsubscribe, forward this message to 
To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew at

More information about the b-hebrew mailing list