1 Kings 11:18

Paul Zellmer zellmer at cag.pworld.net.ph
Wed Sep 9 08:39:51 EDT 1998

Al Silberman wrote:

> Which brings up the following questions:
> 1. Why aren't house and land listed together?
> 2. Wouldn't it be more natural to say land then house?


One possibility is that the land was not the location of the house.  It could have
been a source of income (farmland or the like).  If that is the case, then Pharaoh
gave a place to live in, something to live on, and a source of future income.  That
would seem a logical progression, IMO.


Paul and Dee Zellmer, Jimmy Guingab, Geoffrey Beltran
Ibanag Translation Project
Cabagan, Philippines

zellmer at faith.edu.ph

More information about the b-hebrew mailing list