1 Sam 8:2
596547 at ican.net
Tue Oct 13 19:57:52 EDT 1998
Dear friends, I forward this message in a slightly edited form which I
have also sent to one of the list members. I would appreciate hearing any
comments you might care to make.
> From: Bryan Rocine <596547 at ican.net>
> It seems that 1 Sam 8:2 is too much like a few other constructions to
> "text-criticize" it off-hand. For instance, Gen 38:7(cf. 1 Chr 2:3),
> 39:21, Jdg 1:19, 1 Kings 11:20, 18:7, 1 Chr. 23:11--these all have wayehi
> followed by a verbless clause that is *not* a temporal reference of some
> sort. (btw, notice that none of these examples is from 1 Sam, in which
> is perhaps the only example of its kind.) any thoughts?
> Could the way:hiy of 1 Sam 8:2 break the causal chain that would have
> implied without it? In other words, could the writer be separating
> Samuel's placement of his sons as judges from the corrupt behavior of the
> sons, thereby making Samuel UN-responsible? If we take out the way:hiy
> we more likely to impute IRresponsibility to Samuel for his placing of
> The other wayehi + (non-temporal)verbless clause strings I cite above
> also have this function "to break the causal chain." E.g., the
> of (er in Gen 38:7 is separated from his father's taking a wife for him
> the previous clause. I realize "break the causal chain" may be an idea
> that seems at first blush to contradict your understanding of the
> of wayehi which is primarily macro-conjunctive, but perhaps not.
> Personally, I call wayehi a transitional device. As such a wayehi *both*
> joins and divides a text. perhaps the special case of wayehi +
> (non-temporal)verbless clause does more to disjoin a text that would
> otherwise be "too coherent" than it does to conjoin parts of a discourse
> that would otherwise be too readily construed as independent.
> B. M. Rocine
> Associate Pastor
> Living Word Church
> 6101 Court St. Rd.
> Syracuse, NY 13208
More information about the b-hebrew