[B-Greek] Paul writing in Latin or Hebrew/Aramaic?
jeffcockrell at gmail.com
Mon Aug 23 10:21:32 EDT 2010
Jewett's commentary is certainly good in understanding the historical and
cultural context of Paul's letter to Rome. One might also consult Capes,
"Rediscovering Paul," and Schnelle, "Apostle Paul." For detailed information
on languages of Palestine see Fitzmyer article in CBQ (32, Oct 1970).
Greek was the dominate language in the first century and was spoken in the
most atrocious areas. Greek became the preferred language of the Roman upper
class and was used among the native Jewish population of Israel.
Jeff Cockrell, PhD (Wales)
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:03 AM, <jgibson000 at comcast.net> wrote:
> On 8/23/2010 7:56 PM, Justin Chamberlain wrote:
>> The Romans did in fact speak Latin but Greek was the language of commerce
>> and a universally known language of the day. The Romans could read and
>> Greek. Paul wrote to the Roman church in Greek for this reason
> Actually I think he wrote in Greek not because of anything characteristic
> of those /native/ to Italy and to The City, but because of the demographic
> of the Christian communities. These would most likely be people or the
> children of people who came from the Eastern portion of the Roam Empire.
> And is it not actually inaccurate to speak of the Roman church. In Romans
> Paul never speaks of the Church in Rome, but cells of believers.
> For a thorough and insightful discussion of the demographics of the Christ
> believers in Rome in the 60s of the first century CE, see Robert Jewett's
> Hermeneia commentary on Romans.
> Jeffrey B. Gibson, D.Phil. (Oxon)
> 1500 W. Pratt Blvd.
> Chicago, Illinois
> e-mail jgibson000 at comcast.net
> B-Greek home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek
> B-Greek mailing list
> B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
More information about the B-Greek