[B-Greek] hPER DE
srunge at logos.com
Thu May 28 11:34:22 EDT 2009
I am not sure what of Levinsohn you have read, but your rendering here is within the scope of how he describes DE, marking the next step or development of the story or argument. The presence of contrast is not a bench mark that he has set, but instead is found more in traditional explanations. I maintain that neither KAI nor DE indicate the presence of semantic continuity or discontinuity, as do AND and BUT in English. Your description fits well with the view of DE marking the next development or stage of the discourse.
As horrified as you may be about this (in the cataphoric sense), you may agree with Levinsohn more than you think.
From: b-greek-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org [mailto:b-greek-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Elizabeth Kline
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 8:27 AM
Subject: Re: [B-Greek] hPER DE
TOUTWN KAI TWN KATA MEROS and what is said in the preceding context are coreferential. The fact that different levels of detail are suggested doesn't override the fact that they point to the same thing.
DE can be used to introduce contrast, but it is commonly used as a bland conjunction with a function of "addition" which seems to be the most obvious way to understand it here. To read here a note of contrast between the "executive summary" and the promised KAI TWN KATA MEROS seems a bit forced. On this topic, and its details, I have read S.Levinsohn numerous times over fifteen years and will have to admit that I find his treatment of DE difficult to accept.
On May 27, 2009, at 10:14 PM, Iver Larsen wrote:
>> While working through the Iver's comments on PERI DE in Paul, I was
>> reading Helma Dik:2007  and her discussion of themes, topics, and
>> so forth. Rather than use her examples from Thucid. which might not
>> go down well here, I found a passage 2Mac. 11:20 which illustrates a
>> fronted constituent, introduced by hPER DE, which is used to link the
>> following statement with the shared information from the preceding
>> 2Mac. 11:20 ὑπὲρ δὲ τούτων καὶ τῶν κατὰ μέρος ἐντέταλμαι τούτοις τε
>> καὶ τοῖς παρ᾿ ἐμοῦ διαλεχθῆναι ὑμῖν
>> 2MAC. 11:20 hUPER DE TOUTWN KAI TWN KATA MEROS ENTETALMAI TOUTOIS TE
>> KAI TOIS PAR᾿ EMOU DIALECQHNAI hUMIN
>> The fronted constituent hUPER DE TOUTWN KAI TWN KATA MEROS is
>> anaphoric, summing up what has been said in the immediately preceding
>> context and therefor can be assumed to be shared information. It
>> serves to tie the former statements to ENTETALMAI TOUTOIS TE KAI TOIS
>> PAR᾿ EMOU DIALECQHNAI hUMIN.
> I think this illustrates that hUPER can function in certain contexts
> like PERI, but it not as common a PERI. There is also a PERI DE TOUTWN
> in 2 Mac 4:43, where the TOUTWN is anaphoric as it usually is, but
> PERI points forward to the charges leveled against Menelaos.
> Although TOUTWN is anaphoric the new theme introduced is shown by KATA
> MEROS. I am afraid I do not agree that the hUPER phrase as a whole is
> anaphoric, nor that it sums up the preceding context.
> NRSV has the following translation of the letter concerned:
> "16 The letter written to the Jews by Lysias was to this effect:
> “Lysias to the people of the Jews, greetings. 17 John and Absalom, who
> were sent by you, have delivered your signed communication and have
> asked about the matters indicated in it. 18 I have informed the king
> of everything that needed to be brought before him, and he has agreed
> to what was possible. 19 If you will maintain your goodwill toward the
> government, I will endeavor in the future to help promote your
> welfare. 20 And concerning such matters and their details, I have
> ordered these men and my representatives to confer with you. 21
> The one hundred forty-eighth year, Dioscorinthius twenty- fourth.”
> (164 BC)
> Verses 16 to 19 gives the "executive summary" of Lysias' response
> without details. He acknowledges receipt of their letter, and after
> having discussed it with the king gives a promise of support, if the
> Jews show goodwill.
> The DE in
> 20 introduces a new paragraph, a change from the general to the
> specific and from what has been done to what will be done in that he
> Concerning the
> details of these matters, my representatives (who carry the
> response) and yours
> will discuss it. In my view, the fronting contrasts the general
> response already given in the letter to the specific and detailed
> discussion to come later.
B-Greek home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek B-Greek mailing list B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek
More information about the B-Greek