[B-Greek] Help with Hebrews 4:2

Mark Lightman lightmanmark at yahoo.com
Sat May 2 17:52:21 EDT 2009

This is a good quesiton, I hope the first of many from you.
This is an instance where I would apply the "Conrad rule of
medio-passivity" which states that if a verb CAN be construed
as a middle, if should be, or, unless a verb HAS to be construed
as a passive, it should be construed as a middle.  I think the basis
of the Conrad rule is that the passive is a later development from
the middle.  Not that there is any thing wrong with taking
SUGKEKERASMENOUS as a passive.  The Conrad rule is a
rule, not a commandment. 
Mark L. 

--- On Sat, 5/2/09, Alan Martin <martinv at fredericktown.k12.mo.us> wrote:

From: Alan Martin <martinv at fredericktown.k12.mo.us>
Subject: [B-Greek] Help with Hebrews 4:2
To: b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org
Date: Saturday, May 2, 2009, 10:16 AM

This is my first posted question.  I am grateful for this resource.  

My question regards the Perfect Participle translated "having been mixed
I noticed that it is a masculine, accusative, plural, probably modifying
the demonstrative pronoun ekeinous.  My question is how does the perfect
participle make sense translated as a passive voice rather than a
middle.  It seems to me that a middle voice makes more sense, but I am
still unsure.  

Thank you ahead of time for your help.  I am still very far from
advanced in my study, I am simply a pastor seeking to rightly divide the
word of truth.


B-Greek home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek
B-Greek mailing list
B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org


More information about the B-Greek mailing list