[B-Greek] 1 Pt 4.2

George F Somsel gfsomsel at yahoo.com
Mon Sep 17 09:54:43 EDT 2007


My apologies, I misspoke.  What I should have said was "It is not necessary for the infinitive to follow immediately upon the preposition and article."
 
george
gfsomsel
 
Therefore, O faithful Christian, search for truth, hear truth, 
learn truth, love truth, speak the truth, hold the truth, 
defend the truth till death.
 
- Jan Hus
_________



----- Original Message ----
From: George F Somsel <gfsomsel at yahoo.com>
To: Mitch Larramore <mitchlarramore at yahoo.com>; B Greek <b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 8:29:27 AM
Subject: Re: [B-Greek] 1 Pt 4.2


What we have here is the preposition EIS with the acc of the articular inf indicating purpose.  This is expressed both negatively and positively

EIS TO MHKETI ANQRWPWN EPIQUMIAIS  ALLA QELHMATI QEOU 
TON EPILOIPON EN SARKI BIWSAI CRONON 

A. T. Robertson notes regarding the separation of the preposition from the article that it is not necessary that the article follow immediately upon the preposition.  

It is not necessary for the article to come next to the inf. as in Mt. 13:25. Several words may intervene and the clause may be one of considerable extent. Cf. Mk. 5:4; Ac. 8:11; Heb. 11:3; 1 Pet. 4:2. But the N. T. does not have such extended clauses of this nature as the ancient Greek, and the adverbs usually follow the inf. The English “split inf.” is not quite parallel. 

Robertson, A. (1919; 2006). A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research (1070). 

This is qualified both negatively and positively 

1. MHKETI ANQRWPWN EPIQUMIAIS -- ALLA
2. QELHMATI QEOU

george
gfsomsel

Therefore, O faithful Christian, search for truth, hear truth, 
learn truth, love truth, speak the truth, hold the truth, 
defend the truth till death.

- Jan Hus
_________



----- Original Message ----
From: Mitch Larramore <mitchlarramore at yahoo.com>
To: B Greek <b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 7:38:49 AM
Subject: [B-Greek] 1 Pt 4.2


This question deals with word order:

EIS TO MHKETI ANQRWPWN EPIQUMIAIS ALLA QELHMATI QEOU
TON EPILOIPON EN SARKI BIWSAI CRONON 

I realize Greeks have flexibility in word order, but
I'm assuming even then there is some reason for the
order. Does EIS TO go with BIWSAI? And if so, why is
BIWSAI between SARKI and CRONON? I can't make sense
out of it reading it in English.

Mitch Larramore
Sugar Land, Texas


       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! FareChase.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/
---
B-Greek home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek
B-Greek mailing list
B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Shape Yahoo! in your own image.  Join our Network Research Panel today!   http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 

---
B-Greek home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek
B-Greek mailing list
B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect.  Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 



More information about the B-Greek mailing list