[B-Greek] Acts 13:32-33
Bryant J. Williams III
bjwvmw at com-pair.net
Tue Sep 4 14:38:09 EDT 2007
I am more inclined to view the following:
1. hOTI TAUTHN hO QEOS EKPEPLHRWKEN TOIS TEKNOIS [AUTWN] hHMIN as completing the
statement of promise in verse 32.
2. hHMIN goes with TOIS TEKNOIS not with ANASTHSAS.
3. My translation would be "that this [promise ( referring to EPANGELIAN by
agreement in vs. 32)] God has fulfilled to us their children.."
4. This also reflects the fact that I am taking the AUTWN hHMIN as being the
correct reading in the text versus AUTWN hHMWN. "And we bring to you the good
news that what God promised to the fathers, this he has fulfilled to us their
children having raised Jesus; ..."
5. AVASTHSAS as the participle is Ist Aor. Act. Nom. Sing. Masc. I take it that
since the main verb is EKPEPLHRWKE[N], which is Perfect Active 3rd Sing of
EKPLHROW, that AVASTHSAS should be translated as "having raised" reflecting that
Rev. Bryant J. Williams III
----- Original Message -----
From: "Iver Larsen" <iver_larsen at sil.org>
To: "BG" <b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 9:55 AM
Subject: [B-Greek] Acts 13:32-33
> We have the following text from Paul's speech in the synagogue in Antioch in
> καὶ ἡμεῖς ὑμᾶς εὐαγγελιζόμεθα
> KAI hHMEIS hUMAS EUAGGELIZOMEQA
> And WE are telling YOU the good news (about)
> τὴν πρὸς τοὺς πατέρας ἐπαγγελίαν γενομένην,
> THN PROS TOUS PATERAS EPAGGELIAN GEGOMENHN
> the promise that came to our forefathers
> ὅτι ταύτην ὁ θεὸς ἐκπεπλήρωκεν τοῖς τέκνοις [αὐτῶν]
> hOTI TAUTHN hO QEOS EKPEPLHRWKEN TOIS TEKNOIS (AUTWN)
> that God has fulfilled this very (promise) for the(ir) children,
> ἡμῖν ἀναστήσας Ἰησοῦν
> hHMIN ANASTHSAS IHSOUN
> having raised up Jesus for US (by raising up...)
> Two questions:
> 1) Should hHMIN not be taken with ANASTHSAS rather than as an apposition to
> TOIS TEKNOIS AUTWN?
> 2) What is the meaning in this context of ANASTHSAS?
> It seems to me that the raising here has the sense of "bringing onto the
> scene", i.e. the incarnation of Jesus as the next verse says "You are my
> son, I have fathered you today". There is a similar construction in 13:22
> where God raised up David as a king for the people:
> ἤγειρεν τὸν Δαυὶδ αὐτοῖς
> HGEIREN TON DAVID AUTOIS
> he raised up David for them
> The relevant promise to the forefathers is Deut 18:18(and 15), which in the
> LXX reads:
> προφήτην ἀναστήσω αὐτοῖς ἐκ τῶν ἀδελφῶν αὐτῶν
> PROFHTHN ANASTHSW AUTOIS EK TWN ADELFWN AUTWN
> The verb to raise up with a dative beneficiary is used in all cases to mean
> to bring onto the scene for someone's benefit. This is one reason that I
> prefer to take hUMIN in 13:33 with ANASTHSAS, because the promise to the
> forefathers from Deuteronomy must have been very wellknown to Peter,
> Stephen, Paul and Luke and the original audience. It is quoted or alluded to
> several times in Acts, see below.
> Another reason is the word order.
> If the text was supposed to mean "for us, their children", then hUMIN ought
> to have preceded TOIS TEKNOIS AUTWN. It is more likely that the hUMIN is
> fronted before ANASTHSAS to indicate that whereas the promise came to the
> forefathers, it was actually fulfilled for their "children", when God raised
> up for US Jesus (as the saviour and king and Messiah).
> There are a number of examples of "raising up" connected with a dative
> pronoun, e.g.
> Luk 1:69: καὶ ἤγειρεν κέρας σωτηρίας ἡμῖν ἐν οἴκῳ Δαυὶδ παιδὸς αὐτοῦ
> KAI HGEIREN KERAS SWTHRIAS hHMIN EN OIKWi DAVID PAIDOS AUTOU
> Act 3:22 (Peter): Μωϋσῆς μὲν εἶπεν ὅτι Προφήτην ὑμῖν ἀναστήσει κύριος
> MWUSHS MEN EIPEN hOTI PROFHTHN *hUMIN ANASTHSEI* KURIOS
> Act 3:26: (Peter) ὑμῖν πρῶτον ἀναστήσας ὁ θεὸς τὸν παῖδα αὐτοῦ ἀπέστειλεν
> *hUMIN PRWTON ANASTHSAS* hO QEOS TON PAIDA AUTOU APESTEILEN AUTON
> Act 7:37 (Stephen) οὗτός ἐστιν ὁ Μωϋσῆς ὁ εἴπας τοῖς υἱοῖς Ἰσραήλ, Προφήτην
> ὑμῖν ἀναστήσει ὁ θεὸς ἐκ τῶν ἀδελφῶν ὑμῶν ὡς ἐμέ
> hOUTOS ESTIN hO MWUSHS hO EIPAS TOIS hUIOS ISRAHL: PROFHTHN *hUMIN
> ANASTHSEI* hO QEOS EK TWN ADELFWN hUMWN hWS EME (not an exact quote from the
> Hebrew text or LXX, but very much like Acts 13:33)
> Why do so many commentators and translations take hUMIN with TOIS TEKNOIS
> and assume that this refers to raising Jesus from the dead when the patterns
> and context in Acts so strongly suggest a fronted dative pronoun with this
> verb? (I suppose the answer is that the KJV got it wrong, so others follow.)
> I have had a hard time finding a good English translation. Probably JBP is
> the closest, but still not quite right: "And as for us we tell you the good
> that the promise made to our forefathers has come true—that, in raising up
> Jesus, God has fulfilled it for us their children."
> Iver Larsen
> B-Greek home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek
> B-Greek mailing list
> B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.5/988 - Release Date: 09/04/07 9:14 AM
For your security this Message has been checked for Viruses as a courtesy of Com-Pair Services!
More information about the B-Greek