[B-Greek] Brekekekex Hapax Hapax

Peter Bekins pbekins at fuse.net
Fri Oct 5 12:18:22 EDT 2007


Completely off the topic of B-Greek, but relevant to your aside so I  
thought worth mentioning, Ancient Sumerian actually had a plural  
morpheme for your example. The normal plural marker is MESH, but  
there is another, HI.A, which is used for an individuated plural, ie  
a plural group of unique referents like "hapax(c)es". It carries over  
into Akkadian, but doesn't always retain the individuated sense. I  
always wondered why they kept it around in the language, and I'm not  
sure if any other language has anything similar.

Peter Bekins

> Mark Goodacre had a note yesterday in his NT Gateway Blog
> (http://tinyurl.com/3azst9)
> on the subject of hapaxes (or hapaces -- but how can there really
> be a plural of a word that makes only a unique appearance in  
> literature?).

More information about the B-Greek mailing list