opening of Romans and definite articles

David Thiele thielogian at
Thu May 9 06:46:44 EDT 2002

Dear Paul,

On your second question: the mixed case in
illusionary.  IHSOUS does not fully decline.  IHSOU
serves as genitive, vocative or dative, depending on
the context.  In this case it is clearly dative
despite appearing genitive in form.

David Thiele
Pacific Adventist University
Papua New Guinea

--- ENS PJ Abshire USNR <paulsdomain at> wrote:
> Greetings all ~
> This is my first post.  A friend and I are going to
> read through some of Romans.  Looking at the
> greeting, I had the feeling that the presence or
> absence of definite articles for some of the nouns
> does not correspond one for one to the definiteness
> or indefiniteness of those nouns.  Is there some
> plasticicty here or not?
> Another (unrelated) question - what is the
> significance, if any, of the mixed case "EN IHSOU
> Thanks all, and especially to those who maintain
> this list.
> ENS Paul Abshire USN
> ---------------------------------
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Shopping - Mother's Day is May 12th!
> [MIME/HTML formatting removed by moderator;
> list-members are
> urged PLEASE to observe BG protocol and refrain from
> posting
> messages in MIME/HTML formatting--use plain-text
> ASCII formatting
> only. Thanks. cwc]
> ---
> B-Greek home page:
> You are currently subscribed to b-greek as:
> [thielogian at]
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to
> $subst('Email.Unsub')
> To subscribe, send a message to
> subscribe-b-greek at

Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts

More information about the B-Greek mailing list