Rleedy at bju.edu
Fri Mar 15 13:16:58 EST 2002
Carl, you know I'm always working in great haste. I do see in one of
your previous posts that you gave ETARPON and ETRAPON as alternative
aorists; that one works. I shouldn't have missed it. May I plead for
a slight mitigation in my culpability for inattention, though? It
appears to me to be your only "valid" example (measuring validity in
terms of what I was looking for), put last in a list of other examples
the "invalidity" of which conditioned me to overlook the last one.
Where did you mention QARSOS and QRASOS in your earlier messages? Am I
blind? Perhaps, especially if blindness can be produced by haste. :-)
I will make it a point to get over to the Library and see Smyth since
I can see now that he DOES have at least some examples of the kind of
thing I am looking for. Thanks for the help, and accept my apology for
my contribution to the testiness of our exchange.
Students are finishing a quiz; must get back to class.
>>> "Carl W. Conrad" <cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu> 03/15/02 12:50PM
QARSOS and QRASOS as alternative forms of the same noun won't work?
and ETRAPON as alternative forms of the same verb stem won't work?
Smyth will do you no good and you're actually looking for a very
narrowly-defined conception of METATHESIS.
At 11:06 AM -0500 3/15/02, Randy Leedy wrote:
>Well, Carl, I'll have to go to the library to get a look at Smyth.
>one classical grammar I have on my shelf, which I hardly ever
>is Goodwin, not Smyth. I thought sure I had Smyth. Maybe it was at
>home and got misplaced when we moved a year ago? Anyway, if the
>further examples you cite are representative of what Smyth
>it's STILL not what I'm looking for. Yes, the formations of various
>principal parts of a verb, or stem modifications within a noun
>declension involve metathesis. But that's not the kind of
>I'm looking for. I think we're getting wavelengths crossed over a
>definition. I'm working with a sense of the word broad enough to
>include any transposition of letters at all, not limited to the
>morphological workings involved in various inflectional patterns.
>looking for the kind of thing where a given word would be listed in
>dictionary under two different lemma forms, where the difference in
>the lemmas is a transposition of letters. Again, my theoretical
>example: PROBATON and PROTABON would be listed in the lexicon
>separately. One article would note the variant forms of the same
>and the other article would probably be a simple "see" reference
>pointing to the other one.
>Based on a rhyme with PROBATON, I did dig out of the mental
>a word with a somewhat similar phenomenon: KRABATTOS / KRABBATOS.
>that's not metathesis, because the issue is not a transposition of
>letters but rather a question of which consonant is geminated
No that is different--a matter of pronunciation. But what you want,
seems to me, is what a dictionary (LSJ at least) will list separately
if it's not expected that a reader can make an intelligent guess.
>I will try to get to Smyth soon to see his examples, but, again, if
>your examples reflect the whole range of what Smyth has, he won't
>what I'm looking for. I hope I've finally been adequately clear
>what it is I'm trying to find. If not, I guess I'll just give up
>before I get further behind! (I envy people with the foresight to
>give up while they're still ahead.)
Yes, it's obvious you're looking for a needle in a haystack!
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Emeritus)
Most months:: 1647 Grindstaff Road/Burnsville, NC 28714/(828)
cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu OR cwconrad at ioa.com
More information about the B-Greek