implied verbs in Rom 5.18

Clayton Javurek javurek at asu.edu
Tue Jan 8 09:43:55 EST 2002



Clayton Javurek
E-MAIL: javurek at asu.edu

Douglas Moo in his NIC series commentary on Romans believes that
the word GINOMAI is inherent as the verb in this passage.



-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Lo Vullo [mailto:doulos at merr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:18 AM
To: Biblical Greek
Subject: [b-greek] implied verbs in Rom 5.18


Hi all:

Rom 5.18: ARA OUN hWS DI' hENOS PARAPTWMATOS EIS PANTAS ANQRWPOUS EIS
KATAKRIMA, hOUTWS KAI DI' hENOS DIKAIWMATOS EIS PANTAS ANQRWPOUS EIS
DIKAIWSIN ZWHS ...

We have here a complex sentence with an independent clause and a subordinate
comparative clause. Outside of conjunctions and adverbs, we basically have
two strings of prepositional phrases. My question is: What verb or verbs (or
other word(s)) are implied that make sense of the strings of prepositional
phrases? I don't think I have run across anything quite like this before.
The several prepositional phrases don't look like they can all make sense
construed with only one implied verb.
================

Steven Lo Vullo
Madison, WI 

 


---
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [javurek at asu.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
$subst('Email.Unsub')
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek at franklin.oit.unc.edu

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/b-greek/attachments/20020108/fe68c318/attachment.html 


More information about the B-Greek mailing list