Sequence of actions between verb tenses

Mark Wilson emory2oo2 at hotmail.com
Fri Aug 10 16:01:06 EDT 2001



For what it's worth:

>I say this because from verse 1 down through verse 14, the narrative is
>dominated by repeated aorists (and imperfects of eimi). Then suddenly there
>is a tense shift in v. 15, followed by a continuation of aorists after the
>quotation from John the Baptist. If the present is merely functioning
>neutrally to carry the previous tense forward, why did the writer wait 
>until
>v. 15 to use the device, and why did he abandon it when he continued the
>narrative?

A commentary I am reading on the Gospel of John, by
FF Bruce, does indicate that the Present Tense here
is noteworthy, saying:

"The present tense may indicate that while John himself was long
dead by the time the Gospel was written, his witness
remained (and remains)."

FYI

Mark Wilson

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




More information about the B-Greek mailing list