Romans 1:16,17 - The antecedent of EN AUTW
johnwilking at hotmail.com
Thu Feb 17 20:22:36 EST 2000
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Joe Friberg said,
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "John Wilking" <johnwilking at hotmail.com>
>Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2000 10:49 PM
> > I think I'm asking two questions: one, if AUTWi can grammatically refer
> > the PANTI adjective phrase and, two, if the semantics of EN will permit
> > I found about thirty PAS adjective phrases in the NT that are followed
> > anaphoric reference. Of the thirty, twenty eight (I think), seem to
> > to the adjective phrase. Two of them do not and it appears that they
> > for semantic, not grammatical reasons.
>Could you share this list with the list for consideration?
The following are a few examples.
Rom 2:1 DIO ANAPOLOGHTOS EI, W ANQRWPE PAS hO KRINWN EV hWi GAR KRINEIS...
Heb 5:13 PAS GAR hOMETECWN...NHPIOS GAR ESTIN.
Rom 4:11 ...PATERA PANTWN TWN PISTEUONTWV...EIS TO LOGISQHNAI AUTOIS
Matt 5:28, 13:19; John 3:20; Lk 12:8, etc. Rom 1:7, although exophoric,
appears anaphoric to a degree.
The following has an anaphoric expression that does not refer to the
John 18:4 IHSOUS OUN EIDWS PANTA TA ERCOMENA EP' AUTON EXHLQEN KAI LEGEI
AUTOIS.... The AUTOIS doesn't refer to PANTA TA ERCOMENA but to the
officials and soldiers in verse 3. You can't ask questions of future
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
More information about the B-Greek