PUR

Carl W. Conrad cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu
Wed Aug 23 12:10:56 EDT 2000


At 5:57 PM +0200 8/23/00, Wieland Willker wrote:
>Thanks to all for the info!
>
>So, it appears that some say (Perseus) TO PUR is singular only and TA PURA
>is a different word and appears in the plural only. Does this make sense?
>As a third form we have hH PURA with the normal 1st declension (plural and
>singular).

Perhaps we're using the language differently. I would say that PUR is a
neuter noun most commonly used in the singular but that there is a
specialized sense of it in the plural TA PURA. On the other hand, hH PURA
is a different word and has a different meaning altogether, although
derivative from the same root as the neuter PUR.

-- 

Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics/Washington University
One Brookings Drive/St. Louis, MO, USA 63130/(314) 935-4018
Home: 7222 Colgate Ave./St. Louis, MO 63130/(314) 726-5649
cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu 



More information about the B-Greek mailing list