Discourse Analysis - Already but Not Yet

Eric S. Weiss eweiss at gte.net
Tue Aug 1 13:28:02 EDT 2000

Thomas Schreiner, in his Baker commentary on Romans begins each section 
with a diagram/explanation of the thought flow. He has a chapter in his 
book on the Pauline Epistles (Scot McKnight's series - also Baker, I 
believe) where he explains how to follow the author's argument. It's the 
closest thing I've seen in a major commentary series (but I haven't looked 
a lot) to DA. I don't know if the other volumes in the Baker series do 

Some of Schreiner's arguments about the apostle's meaning (i.e., where he 
argues for one view as opposed to another view) are based on some DA 

On the other hand, he paragraphs Romans 8:12-17 as a single paragraph, with 
14ff. following from and based on 12-13. So does NA-27. But it seems to me 
from reading it that Romans 8:12-13 breaks the flow of what precedes and 
what follows. 8:12-13 describes behavior, whereas 8:14-17, and what 
precedes 8:12 (i.e., 8:1-11) describes state - i.e., who we are in Christ 
based on what God has done. Part of it, of course, depends on the 
translation of EIPER in 8:9, and Schreiner takes it to mean "if it is true" 
as opposed to "since it is true." He argues that the Spirit gives us the 
power/ability to keep the law, something that is now incumbent upon us, as 
I read him.

Which says to me that presuppositions can govern DA, whether my 
presuppositions or Schreiner's, assuming a DA case can be made for breaking 
8:12-13 apart from 8:1-11 and 8:14-17.

More information about the B-Greek mailing list