aramaic New Testament
jwest at Highland.Net
Tue Jan 5 12:11:52 EST 1999
At 03:43 PM 1/5/99 -0500, you wrote:
>Here is a follow-up to my last question.
>How well accepted is it that we have Greek Gospel fragments from pre-100
>CE (O'Callaghan's Mark fragment @60,
> Thiede's Matthew frag at 60,
< Luke frag at 90,
> and John frag at 110)?
>On the flip side, what are the earliest Aramaic fragments, and the
>strength of evidence for an early dating of those frags?
They aint none.
Jim West, ThD
Quartz Hill School of Theology
jwest at highland.net
More information about the B-Greek