aramaic New Testament

Jim West jwest at Highland.Net
Tue Jan 5 12:11:52 EST 1999


At 03:43 PM 1/5/99 -0500, you wrote:
>Here is a follow-up to my last question.
>
>How well accepted is it that we have Greek Gospel fragments from pre-100
>CE (O'Callaghan's Mark fragment @60,

Nope.

> Thiede's Matthew frag at 60,

Nope.

< Luke frag at 90,

Nope.

> and John frag at 110)?

Yup.

>
>On the flip side, what are the earliest Aramaic fragments, and the
>strength of evidence for an early dating of those frags?

They aint none.

>
>Jeramy Townsley


Jim

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Jim West, ThD
Quartz Hill School of Theology

jwest at highland.net




More information about the B-Greek mailing list