aramaic New Testament
nichael at sover.net
Tue Jan 5 17:51:43 EST 1999
jtownsle at iupui.edu wrote:
> How well accepted is it that we have Greek Gospel fragments from pre-100
> CE (O'Callaghan's Mark fragment @60, Thiede's Matthew frag at 60, Luke
> frag at 90, and John frag at 110)?
To answer your question quickly: These datings are accepted by virtually
no textual scholars outside of a very small handful; i.e. O'Callaghan,
Thiede and (maybe) a couple of others.
For an easily accessible discussion of why these datings are almost
certainly not correct, check out Graham Stanton's "Gospel Truth?".
work: ncramer at bbn.com
home: nichael at sover.net
More information about the B-Greek