Rom 12:2 part 2 - PARAKALW + Infinitive KAI Imperatives
j.buchegger at datacomm.ch
Mon Jan 4 04:12:54 EST 1999
This is my second question on Rom 12:2:
2. What about the unusual continuing of the PARAKALW+Infinitive phrase (in
V.1) with the Imperatives in V.2? - Is it correct to say, that one would
expect Infinitves in V.2? What would you call this anomaly? A "oratio
variata" (Winer p.509f)?
Thank you for comments on this.
More information about the B-Greek