The use of participles
clayton stirling bartholomew
c.s.bartholomew at worldnet.att.net
Thu Oct 29 02:51:59 EST 1998
Jerry Dean wrote:
> In Luke 10:25 a question is asked by the lawyer in aorist participle when
> asking what to do. Jesus then responds with present participle. Being
> aware that an aorist participle may or may not mean one event, is it
> possible that the lawyer is asking what "one" event can get one eternal
> life, with Jesus responding that it is not "one" act but a "life style"?
> Does Luke contrasts these two participles in this passage to stress
> continual action against one, or is it just a style for Luke?
I read over the passage and I see nothing at all in the use of participles in
this passage which would lend itself to your proposed interpretation.
TI POIHSAS ZWHN AIWNION KLHRONOMHSW;
I think that TI POIHSAS may indicate either a single thing or a series of
things. The form of the question is vague. TI is a singular neuter accusative,
and if I understand the semantics of TI, it can refer to a series of things, a
collection of things or a single thing. In short the grammar of the passage
does not contain the information you are looking for.
Also, I don't see any participle in Jesus' answer:
TOUTO POIEI KAI ZHSHi
I didn't check any commentaries on this one. Just winging it based on 4-5
years of reading Lukan syntax every day.
Perhaps one of the experts will help you with this.
Clayton Stirling Bartholomew
Three Tree Point
P.O. Box 255 Seahurst WA 98062
More information about the B-Greek