Pauline Authorship of Hebrews

Mark Goodacre M.S.GOODACRE at
Fri Oct 2 08:44:01 EDT 1998

cwconrad at wrote:

>                 ...there appears to be no basis at all in the NT
> Greek text for the proposition being argued here--and although it is
> proposed that "the almost universal testimony of the MS evidence is
> that Hebrews is Pauline," I do wonder exactly what MS evidence is being
> referred to here...

P46 is probably worth mentioning.  It is a papyrus codex of 86 leaves dating 
from c. 200 and featuring epistles in this order: Romans, Hebrews, 1 Cor., 2 
Cor., Eph., Gal., Phil., Col and 1 Thess. I think that this is as early as the 
the paypyrus evidence will take us.

Dr Mark Goodacre       mailto:M.S.Goodacre at
  Dept of Theology                Tel: +44 (0)121 414 7512
  University of Birmingham      Fax: +44 (0)121 414 6866
  Birmingham  B15 2TT
  United Kingdom

World Without Q:  

More information about the B-Greek mailing list