Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] handling commit mails

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Andrew \"ruskie\" Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] handling commit mails
  • Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 00:50:18 +0200

Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote :

> PGP verify signed message
> gpg: Signature made tor 25 okt 2005 00:27:18 CEST using DSA key ID F009764F
> gpg: Good signature from "Jeremy Blosser <jblosser AT firinn.org>"
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> owner.
> Primary key fingerprint: 867D C269 21C2 7643 E9E3 6478 285D BEC5 F009 764F
> PGP verification success
>
>
> Currently people who want to see our development traffic can subscribe to
> commits in P4. People do this because they're just curious or because they
> want/need to know if something changes in code they are responsible for or
> take an interest in. Fairly often commits get commented on, and sometimes
> these comments turn into discussions of reasonable length.
>
> I would like to see these discussions get back to a tracked ML, both so our
> development process stays as open as possible and so that there is a record
> of any conclusions reached. We try to avoid making decisions in that forum
> without taking it to the regular ML first, but sometimes people conclude
> things anyway, or the same questions come up repeatedly without a reference
> to previous answers.
>
> I know that at one point we looked at setting up a regular ML for people to
> subscribe to that would get all commit messages, but I don't think that
> ever got finished. There's a list out there for sm-commits, but it
> appears to get no real traffic. Is there any reason I shouldn't go ahead
> and get this list receiving all commits? That way it would also be on the
> cc list for any discussions that happened around commits, and we'd have a
> record.
>
> Instead of just one list, would there be any call for separate
> sm-sorcery-commit, sm-cauldron-commit, and sm-grimoire-commit lists? That
> would let people subscribe to just specific projects if they wanted to.
> Alternately those commits could get sent to the existing sm-foo-bugs lists
> we use in bugzilla.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
>

I'd like to request some custom headers X-grimoire and X-section X-project
etc that can be easily filterable with a decen't mda....

Else I see nothing wrong with the commits thing...

--
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru

Key id = 9A5117F8
Key fingerprint = 6731 FEF2 99A8 4672 5962 69AB 3DAF DA67 9A51 17F8





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page