Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

permaculture - Re: [permaculture] Alcohol fuel, grazing, etc...

permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: permaculture

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Claude William Genest <genest@pivot.net>
  • To: permaculture <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [permaculture] Alcohol fuel, grazing, etc...
  • Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:54:50 -0500

Unchecked grazing doesn't work.
Check out Allan Savory

www.holisticmanagement.org

Contrary to popular belief, intensive grazing is necessary for the regeneration of soils !


On Jan 31, 2006, at 3:29 PM, Will Carey wrote:

Rob, all...

Since this series of threads started with a discussion about soil- building&
CO2, Grass-fed dairy, etc... I thought people would like to see this
analysis of grass-fed strategy and the complex issues it brings up.

Do we, as Permaculture designers, have the tools to do multi-criteria
analysis on strategies like this?

<http://www.bayjournal.com/article.cfm?article=2678>

An excerpt from the article...

-----
Whether the Bay would benefit if everyone switched to grass-based dairy
production, though, is a matter of debate.

If pastures are not carefully monitored, cows may wander into streams, or
consume too many legumes, such as clover or alfalfa, which fix nitrogen out
of the atmosphere. and release it in their wastes. “If grazing isn’t managed
well, it can be as bad for the environment, and maybe worse, than a
confinement operation,” Muller said.

While grazing operations produce less nutrients per cow and per acre, some
studies indicate that—because of their low milk production—they actually
generate more nutrients per unit of milk than traditional confined
operations. That means if everyone switched to grazing, nutrient pollution
may actually increase.

“On a local scale, grazing can be important [for water quality] if you are
simply looking at one watershed because it’s basically a method of earning
your living off more land with less production,” said Rick Kohn, an
associate professor of animal and avian sciences at the University of
Maryland.
-----

Will from Oregon

on 1/31/06 09:00, permaculture-request@lists.ibiblio.org at
permaculture-request@lists.ibiblio.org wrote:

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 07:00:01 +0000 (UTC)
From: "robscott@freeshell.org" <robscott@freeshell.org>
Subject: [permaculture] Ethanol proposals
To: permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.62.0601310634060.10837@sdf.lonestar.org>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed


To Dylan, and others who must be having the same thoughts,

I agree with you
A small-scale farmer, running a solar still, could be viable
micro-enterprise. As a single component of a diverse farm, re- using all
outputs for multiple on farm uses, and creating a variety of products, its
a way to keep fueled vehicles in the equasion. Good point.

The portrait Fortune magazine paints is a very different one, and that's
what I'm referring to. The gas stations here in Illinois have "10%
Ethanol" in every pump, and we may soon see that go 20%, 30% and more as
the mentality sets in. And this flies in the face of the environmental
scientists in the midwest who designed these systems - they're the ones
saying NO because it's just PR and handouts to giant landlords, not
environmentalism.

The USDA is primed to promote ethanol as a major U.S. corn-belt product.
Remember the original mixed enthusiasm for USDA Organic Certification?
That's what I'm trying to point out.

There are often calls to mainstream Permaculture, and I've begun to
undersand mainstreaming to mean "commercial mainstreaming" -- in other
words: understanding the significance of hard numbers isn't mainstream
activity...

Until micro-farming is a way to be in the mainstream,
scientific data can be used to fight the mainstreaming.

Rob Scott
Urbana, IL

_______________________________________________
permaculture mailing list
permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page