Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

pcplantdb - Re: [pcplantdb] website comments

pcplantdb@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: pcplantdb

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Stephanie Gerson <sgerson@stanfordalumni.org>
  • To: <john@eco-living.net>, Permaculture Plant Database <pcplantdb@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: [pcplantdb] website comments
  • Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 23:13:59 -0800

I'll respond in CAPS since I don't have an email client that makes the >>
>> things so that readers can tell what was written when. Sorry, still
havn't taken care of that yet - anyone care to give me
instructions...again?

NOT SHOUTING, I PROMISE ;)

------ Original Message ------
Received: 12:08 AM PST, 12/06/2004
From: John Schinnerer <john@eco-living.net>
To: Permaculture Plant Database <pcplantdb@lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [pcplantdb] website comments

Aloha,

> ∑ I don’t like links embedded in text when it’s not obvious where they

> lead, i.e. “Eden and the accompanying dataset will be extended
> dramatically to fulfill the goals of PIW.” – it’s not clear where the
> PIW link at the end of the sentence leads.

Should link 'goals' instead of 'PIW' to vision.

CAN WE PLEASE NOT LINK ANY WORDS TO OTHER PARTS OF THE WEBSITE? I'D
RATHER HAVE ALL THE NAV LINKS IN A NAV BAR *ONLY*. I KNOW THIS MIGHT
SEEM STRANGE FOR A RELATIONSHIP-LOVER LIKE MYSELF, NOT WANTING TO WEAVE
RELATIONSHIPS RIGHT INTO THE TEXT, BUT I FIND THAT IT LOOKS MESSY AND IS
CONFUSING (IF THE LINKS ARE ALSO ELSEWHERE, IN A NAV BAR). SO IF NO ONE
IS TOO OPPOSED, I VOTE FOR LINKS ONLY IN NAV BAR.

OOPS. THAT WAS THE ONLY RESPONSE TO JOHNS THAT I HAD. OH WELL. MY
QUICK FLING WITH CAPS IS OVER.

PEACE
*S





+++++++++++++++
Stephanie Gerson
sgerson@stanfordalumni.org
(c) 415.871.5683


____________________________________________________________________






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page