Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

freetds - Re: [freetds] [unixODBC-dev] ODBC on 64 bit linux - test64

freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Steve Langasek <vorlon AT dodds.net>
  • To: freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [freetds] [unixODBC-dev] ODBC on 64 bit linux - test64
  • Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:58:39 +0000


On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:53:01AM +0100, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 03:33:05PM +0100, ZIGLIO, Frediano,
> > VF-IT wrote:
> > > test64 tests (currently) SQL_DESC_ROWS_PROCESSED_PTR. This
> > pointer holds
> > > the pointer to how many rows are returned/processed. I
> > wrote test cause
> > > this pointer is bound to many attributes. The test demonstrate that
> > > indipendently from how you set this pointer it's always
> > SQLULEN (that is
> > > 64bit on 64bit platforms). So
> > > - SQLSetStmtAttr SQL_ATTR_PARAMS_PROCESSED_PTR
> > > - SQLSetDescField SQL_DESC_ROWS_PROCESSED_PTR (both IPD and IRD)
> > > - SQLSetStmtAttr SQL_ATTR_PARAMS_PROCESSED_PTR
> > > - parameter pirow of SQLParamOptions
> > > - parameter RowCountPtr of SQLExtendedFetch
> > > are SQLULEN* under 64bit!
> >
> > > This is not well stated at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/298678 !!
> > > For this reason SQLROWSETSIZE unixODBC type should be SQLULEN not
> > > SQLUINTEGER !!
> >
> > Which they are with unixODBC 2.2.11; are you saying that the
> > typedef of
> > SQLROWSETSIZE has regressed, or are you using an older version?

> I don't know, on Fedora Core 6 (I think results on Debian/Ubuntu should
> be different)

Ok, but what version of UnixODBC is included in FC6?

--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek AT ubuntu.com vorlon AT debian.org




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page