Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

corpus-paul - Re: hUPO NOMON in Rom 6:14-15: Cranfield vs. James Dunn vs. X

corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Corpus-Paul

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Mark D. Nanos" <nanosmd AT home.com>
  • To: Corpus-paul <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: hUPO NOMON in Rom 6:14-15: Cranfield vs. James Dunn vs. X
  • Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 10:27:35 -0600


on 2/18/01 2:37 AM, moon-ryul jung at moon AT saint.soongsil.ac.kr wrote:

> Dear Mark,
>
> I do not have BAGD. Does it really say that
> given S1. GAR S2, the first statement S1 can be taken
> to mean to support the second sentence S2?
> I thought the second one with GAR supports or explain the
> first statement.

Moon,
No, sorry if my response was confusing.

BDAG 1.c. on GAR comments that when GAR is repeated, "it occurs twice to
introduce several arguments for the same assertion... or to have one clause
confirm the other (under which BDAG includes Rom. 6:14)... or to have
various assertions of one and the same sentence confirmed one after the
other...."

Regards,
Mark
-
Mark D. Nanos, Ph.D.
313 NE Landings Dr.
Lee's Summit, MO 64064
USA
nanosmd AT home.com






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page