Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-devel - Re: [cc-devel] ccREL question

cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Developer discussion for Creative Commons technology and tools

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Maarten Zeinstra <mz AT kl.nl>
  • To: Mike Linksvayer <ml AT gondwanaland.com>
  • Cc: cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [cc-devel] ccREL question
  • Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:47:15 +0100

Thanks Mike,

I see your point, the working group will publish a white paper about the
topic within the next following days. I will post a link to it here so you
can see what we envision.

Cheers,

Maarten

--
Kennisland | www.kl.nl | t +31205756720 | m +31643053919 | @mzeinstra



> On 13 Mar 2015, at 4:20 , Mike Linksvayer <ml AT gondwanaland.com> wrote:
>
> On 03/12/2015 08:31 AM, Maarten Zeinstra wrote:
>> So you would actually advise not using the CC:License term in this case?
>
> Assuming this case is something like deciding the range of edm:rights
> then yes I would advise using dcterms:RightsStatement rather than
> cc:License. Your schema would be more accurate if less precise. It would
> unquestionably allow objects that aren't licenses but instead are public
> domain or other copyright status determinations, even objects which
> themselves have a license property, much like the ODRS example you
> linked to.
>
> Mike
>





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page