Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-devel - [cc-devel] [ cctools-Patches-1781994 ] liblicense.0.4 - gcc -ansi

cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Developer discussion for Creative Commons technology and tools

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "SourceForge.net" <noreply AT sourceforge.net>
  • To: noreply AT sourceforge.net
  • Subject: [cc-devel] [ cctools-Patches-1781994 ] liblicense.0.4 - gcc -ansi
  • Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 05:19:03 -0700

Patches item #1781994, was opened at 2007-08-26 12:19
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=559968&aid=1781994&group_id=80503

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: liblicense
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Peter Miller (pmiller)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: liblicense.0.4 - gcc -ansi

Initial Comment:
This change set increases the portability of the C code - to compilers other
than GCC - by avoiding post-1989 features of the C language definition. Yes:
18 years later and they STILL haven't caught up.

I haven't committed this to my repo yet, I'd like to know what folks think.

Personally, I'd rather be coding in C++, where mixed declarations and
statements are OK. They make a lot of sense. Problem is that most compilers
except GCC are, well, behind the times.

The no-c++ comments thing is important programmer psychology. It provides
the reader with an almost subliminal clue that they are dealing with C, and
not anything else.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=559968&aid=1781994&group_id=80503




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page