Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] song of Deborah

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: JimStinehart AT aol.com
  • To: david.l.steinberg AT rogers.com
  • Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] song of Deborah
  • Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:22:53 -0500 (EST)


David Steinberg:

You wrote: “The fact that ancient names are used proves nothing.”

What a statement! Spoken like a true scholar.

Let’s check out that startling assertion, in the context of Akkadian proper
names with Hurrian characteristics in the Bible. We know that of the 2,235
personal names at Late Bronze Age Nuzi in eastern Syria whose language
group has been determined, 1,500, or 67%, are Hurrian, and 631, or 28%, are
Akkadian. Gelb & Purves, “Nuzi Personal Names”, p. 5. Thus if QYNY at
Genesis
15: 19 is referencing Hurrian princeling rulers in the Canaan of the Amarna
Age, we should not be too surprised if it is a Hurrian name that is based
on an Akkadian verb, since that general pattern applies to about 28% of the
names attested at the Hurrian province of Nuzi. Scholars have long
speculated that QYNY/“Kenites” may be Hurrian: “Like Ginsberg and Maisler,
Abramsky
maintains that the names qanazi and ben-qnad which appear in Ugaritic
inscriptions are Hurrian, and suggests that qanizi is merely qani with the
Hurrian suffix -izi….” Othniel Margalith, “The Sea Peoples in the Bible”
(1994), p. 147.

But even scholars who see the QYNY at Genesis 15: 19 as being Hurrians have
been unable to understand the Biblical name QYNY, because they have failed
to realize that it is, like so many other names attested at the Hurrian
province of Nuzi, an Akkadian name with Hurrian characteristics.

In recording Hurrian names in Biblical Hebrew, the author of the
Patriarchal narratives uses Hebrew yod/Y to represent the Hurrian vowel A as
its own
separate syllable. That was necessary, because Hebrew itself has no such
phenomenon of the vowel A being its own separate syllable. On that basis,
QYNY
is representing Qa-a-ni-a [or Qa-a-ni-ya]. That’s the letter-for-letter
equivalent of the Hurrian name Qa-a-na attested at Nuzi, where Qa-a-na at
Nuzi
is viewed as being a slightly shortened version of Qa-a-ni-a [or
Qa-a-ni-ya]. The first Hebrew yod/Y represents the vowel A (being as
discussed below
a long A (ā) and/or the vowel A as its own separate syllable), whereas in
final position, the second Hebrew yod/Y represents the Hurrian theophoric
suffix -ya [which could alternatively be spelled -a, that is, the Hurrian
vowel
A as its own separate syllable]. What scholars have missed, in being unable
to understand this Hurrian name at Nuzi, is that the root of this Hurrian
name is the Akkadian verb kānu, rather than being a Hurrian common word. The
long vowel A in Akkadian is reflected here in Hurrian by the presence of a
second A after the first A. As to the initial consonant, K and Q are
interchangeable in Hurrian: Nuzi has both Qa-a-na and Ka-a-ni.

The Biblical name QYN-Y conceptually is Kāni-ya, where kāni is the Hurrian
version of the Akkadian verb kānu meaning “to be firm”, and -a or -ya is
the classic Hurrian theophoric suffix referencing Teshup. As such, this
Hurrian-Akkadian-based Patriarchal nickname means: “Teshup Is Firm”. That
was
a fundamental belief of the Hurrians, who viewed their storm-god Teshup as
being strong and implacable, and as such is an apt Patriarchal nickname for
Hurrians in Canaan in the mid-14th century BCE.

How does the foregoing analysis date the Patriarchal narratives? In the
entire Bible, the only two proper names that are Akkadian names with Hurrian
characteristics are found at Genesis 15: 19: QYN-Y and QNZ-Y. Of particular
importance here, we can tell that the Hurrian families who lived in
Jerusalem until exilic times had no Akkadian roots, and never used Akkadian
in any
of their family names, because not a single name in the rest of the Bible
that is paired with QYN-Y [“Kenites”] or QNZ-Y [“Kenizzites”] is an
Akkadian-based name, yet every one of such personal names is a Hurrian name.
Prior
to exilic times, later Biblical authors could come up with Hurrian personal
names, but unlike the truly ancient Patriarchal narratives, later Biblical
authors never came up with a single personal name that is an Akkadian-based
name with Hurrian characteristics.

Though university scholars urge us to ignore proper names for purposes of
dating Biblical texts, that is not good advice. On the contrary, by paying
close attention to the types of proper names in a Biblical text we can often
date that text. When we see $a-am-g/xa-ri and A-al-la and Xavur and Ben
A-na-t in the Song of Deborah, that indicates a composition done shortly
after
the end of the Late Bronze Age. When we see at Genesis 15: 19-21 that
murderers’ row of Hurrian-based Patriarchal nicknames for the Hurrian
princelings
who thoroughly dominated the cities of Canaan as the ruling class only in
the time period of the Amarna Letters -- Qa-a-ni-ya, Qa-ni-zi-ya, Xuti-ya,
Piri-izzi-ya, Gera-ge-$e-ya, A-bu-u-se-ya -- that is telling us that the
Patriarchal narratives were composed in the mid-14th century BCE. Once the
Late
Bronze Age had passed, there is no way that any later author could have come
up with those six Hurrian-based Patriarchal nicknames for the Hurrian
ruling class of Canaan, especially the two Akkadian-based names that have
Hurrian
characteristics.

By ignoring proper names in the Bible for dating purposes, university
scholars have failed to realize how old and historically accurate the Bible
is.

Jim Stinehart
Evanston, Illinois




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page