Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 14:4

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Karl Randolph" <kwrandolph AT email.com>
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 14:4
  • Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 19:10:35 -0500

Herman:

I'll agree with you that Aramaic is bad Hebrew LOL.

Seriously, Isaiah mentions that a rule (proverb) would
be spoken of Babylon and then these five words are that
proverb. Since Babylon was an Aramaic speaking place,
and one of the words appeared to be Aramaic, I wondered
if Isaiah wrote that proverb in Aramaic for effect.*

But Yigal tells me that the sentence structure is wrong for
Aramaic, so I guess that settles that.

Karl W. Randolph.

* sort of like Mark Twain writing Huckleberry Finn in old
American southern accent for effect.

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Herman Meester" <crazymulgogi AT gmail.com>
>
> 2006/5/1, Karl Randolph <kwrandolph AT email.com>:
> >
> >
> > My question was, is this an Aramaic phrase that was
> > inserted into the Hebrew text, in the same way that
> > Jeremiah 10:11 is Aramaic?
> >
> > For me the clue is the Aramaic reading of MDHBH. In
> > Hebrew, the term is unknown. My question, are the
> > other four words in the phrase also Aramaic?
> > Because I don't know Aramaic (beyond enough to read
> > the Aramaic sections of Tanakh), I can't answer
> > that question. If those words are Aramaic, do they
> > have the same meanings as in Hebrew?
> >
> > Any Aramaic scholars out there?
>
>
>
> The idea that it is an Aramaic insertion into the Hebrew would, i.m.h.o., be
> incorrect. Why such an insertion and with what purpose?
> If a single word or a few loose words look Aramaic (even for the sole reason
> of them occurring only once in MT), but are found in a Hebrew text, we have
> no means of arguing that it is not Hebrew. It may or may not be an Aramaic
> loanword, but unless we have a full, evidently Aramaic sentence like
> Jer.10,11
> (a sentence that seems to be in Aramaic for specific reasons of rhyme, or
> simply the fact it was a known Aramaic line)*, we are dealing with Hebrew.
> After all, that's what makes a B-Hebrew word a B-Hebrew word (unless proved
> otherwise): the fact that it is found within the Hebrew corpus of the MT.
>
> regards,
> Herman, Rotterdam
>
> *for the same reason, in Holland one would never translate things like "to
> be or not to be" into Dutch, if, for whatever reason, quoted.
>
> PS Isn't Aramaic just bad Hebrew, after all? ;)

--
___________________________________________________
Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com/





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page