Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: TOHU in Isaiah

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Ian Hutchesson" <mc2499 AT mclink.it>
  • To: "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: TOHU in Isaiah
  • Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 10:39:26 +0200


>> As I read the text it seems to me to preclude the creation
>> of tohu by God. l'-thw br'h, I would think, is rather
>> unequivocal. It says that he didn't create [the earth]
>> chaotic. [..]
>
>Ian it requires being read in context. I think the NRSV represented that
>fairly well. I have little time at the moment to go into it, but read also
>Isa. 49.4 where thw clearly means "vain" (the KJV rendering I think) that
>would also work here. The point, beyond the three words you cite, is that
>God did not just stop with thw, but he formed and and fashioned it to be
>inhabited.

Christian,

I work on the notion that the word thw has a single
"semantic core" and I went through all the examples a
while back to see if it could be established. What that
seems to me to be is the idea of confusion. The
translator, when confronted with words whose
significance is not straightforward and doesn't fit the
known attempts to define them, will attempt to make
sense of the word in its context. The context in
Isa 49:4 has words which indicate lack of substance of
the achievement referred to, hence the use of "vain"
to the AV translation. The word ryk can be used
regarding vessels, indicating empty. hbl seems to
indicate "vapour". Then we have thw. Each of these
words has a tangible significance, while they are used
here and elsewhere for the allusive significance they
suggest. thw in Isa 49:4 doesn't mean "vain" and
neither do the other words there I've mentioned. But
the problem is posed by the translator who has to make
meaning of it for the target audience. Look how the
NRSV deals with the verse in an analogous manner:

But I have labored IN VAIN (ryk)
I have spent my strength
for NOTHING (thw) and VANITY (hbl)

Here is the Vulgate's approach:

in vacuum laboravi
sine causa et vane fortitudinem meam

Both make sense to us, though they are not really
translations at all, more like paraphrases at this
point (and probably the latter had a little influence
on the former).

The following:

But I have laboured for emptiness
I have spent my strength
for confusion and vapour

would make just as much sense to us as well I
think.

Now I may be wrong about the "semantic core" of the
word. I am just using the same data as everyone
else, though I am trying not to change the
representation of it going into English. As I have
said many times I don't know much about Hebrew at
all so I am open to any other suggestion of a base
significance of the word based on its usage,
bearing in mind the lack of "abstract" words in
Hebrew.


Ian








Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page