Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: vayyiqtol, assumption-rolf

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Kimmo Huovila <kimmo.huovila AT helsinki.fi>
  • To: Rolf Furuli <furuli AT online.no>, b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: vayyiqtol, assumption-rolf
  • Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 18:06:46 +0300


Rolf Furuli wrote:
>
> Two grammarians who advocate the view about semantic meaning are H.P.
> Grice and M. Broman Olsen. You can disagree, but you can hardly say that it
> is not a sound linguistic principle, and it can be falsified. You can just
> point to a situation wher RWC ("run"), or $YR ("sing") is non-durative
> (punctual). If you cannot do that, you should accept that durativity can be
> classified as "semantic meaning" because there are examples where it is
> uncancelable.

Is this a little bit circular? If a punctual verb is one that cannot be
predicated over time, and a durative verb is the converse (that may, but
does not have to, be predicated over time), it would not definitionally
make any sense to speak of a durative verb being punctual. Or do you
mean something different by punctual? Could you give a constructed
example of a sentence that would demonstrate a punctual use of 'run' or
'sing'?

Kimmo




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page