From: Paul Cereghino <paul.cereghino@comcast.net>
I think the colaborative writing opportunities in a wiki are very powerful. What I mistrust is that the overall structure of the wiki lacks form. In other words... the whole is less than the sum of its parts. However, I am not convinced that a step up in complexity is necessary, but rather a better organization of the wiki concept may serve the purpose.
I'd propose that this is due to to flaws: the 'pages' of a wiki are not classifiable, nor are the ways that wikis connect with each other clearly classified.
Christopher Alexander's Pattern Language stands out as a stellar example of a dynamic user-engaging presentation of complex design theory. If something of that power could be constructed for a permaculture we would be on to something. Why does it work so well?
The structure of each "Alexander Pattern" is fairly constant. The pattern is connected to larger scale patterns, an argument for the importance of the pattern is made, the argument is discussed, the critical characteristics of the proposed pattern are summarized, and the pattern is linked to the most relevant smaller scale patterns. Rich's reference to a documentation convention may be a solution.
Each Alexander pattern is roughly located on a 'scale' axis -- from large scale patterns to small scale patterns. Wikis are not organized along some critical axis in this way. Can a category be assigned to a wiki page along a scale continuum (landscape > Site > guild), and this axis be used to organize total content?
Each Alexander Pattern is the same kind of animal... it is a pattern describing a spatial arrangement of an element or elements. Permawiki contains a whole zoo full of animals -- some oink and some fly. Some of them could qualify as 'design elements' (CHICKEN or FRUIT TREE) while others are concepts (ZONES or KEYLINE) while others are actual design patterns (HERB SPIRAL or APPLE GUILD).
Can a wiki either be narrowed to one type of page, or have pageslabeled so that they can be observed in groups of similar pages.. A
The linkages between these each 'wiki' are only defined by the text surrounding the hyperlinked word. There is no convention for how concept/elements link to eachother. Structuring the discussion of how on pattern relates to another may be the critical link.
Here'd be my list of goals for a permaculture wiki:
# The wiki helps a person identify interactions between elements to develop new and unique patterns. This can happen at various scales... linking systems accross a landscape, or elements within a site, or guilds within a vegetation mosaic.
# The wiki allows a person to change scale or stay within the same scale consciously, and stay on topic. If the reader is interested in reflecting on concepts, they can follow that path.. if they are deadset on thinking about constructing guilds they can wander at that level.
# the wiki references high-quality sources of information, but does not attempt to contain all information within itself - the function of the wiki is to describe linkages between elements, and design solutions that integrate multiple linkages. Public domain PDF's could be linked within the server.
# wiki pages would be peer reviewed, and elevated as 'high quality drafts -- the whole wiki could be publishable as a PDF edition by using consistent formating and large scale information structures.
## In terms of A wiki page should be as short as possible while serving the function on fitting the concept, pattern or element into the whole. I once had a professor who always gave us profound essay questions and then limited the response to two pages double spaced 12 point font. It was brutal, and took twice as long as spewing out 10 pages of text. To achieve this the function of an information unit (a wiki page) has to be clear as possible.
I never had more than a handful of response to my
Permaculture web hosting cooperative. Would ibiblio
sponsor such a coop to get it off the ground? Would
ibiblio allow root access for us to install/configure
software? I'd love to see this develop into a "highly
available" global topology of web hosts (talk about
reliability and permanence).
The problem with that wiki is that the install of the wiki software was done
by Wikia,
not us, and there's no way to change the functionality of it. Furthermore,
they own the site
and our data and can it keep online or not as they choose. There's no
security there for the long haul.
Do they allow sever admin level access to the host? Would we create our own logins, or do we depend on
them for that? Do we get the "root" password or even
sudo?
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.